Couldn’t Maui County’s appeal “gut” the Clean Water Act, allowing for pollution nationwide?

No. There’s been no change in the way the Clean Water Act has been regulated since Congress enacted it in the 1970s. The Earthjustice lawsuit, like similar lawsuits across the country, sought to expand the coverage of the Clean Water Act. The Hawaii District Court agreed with the plaintiffs and created a new theory of liability, ruling that Maui needed a permit under the Clean Water Act in 2014, and the 9th Circuit came up with another new theory of liability in 2018. This is despite neither the state or federal regulators ever bringing any enforcement action, or requiring such a permit. Congress’ intent was for the Clean Water Act to apply to point source discharges, not non-source points such as Maui’s use of injection wells where recycled water mixes with sea and groundwater. Simply put, you can’t “gut” something that’s not there.

Show All Answers

1. Why does the Victorino administration maintain Maui County’s appeal of the Lahaina injection well case before the U.S. Supreme Court?
2. How has Maui County operating its wastewater facilities so far?
3. Couldn’t Maui County’s appeal “gut” the Clean Water Act, allowing for pollution nationwide?
4. Hasn’t water from West Maui injection wells negatively impacted the reef and fish in West Maui, particularly at Kahekili Beach where a tracer dye study found the presence of water from injection wells